The Relative Age Effect

In youth sports and academia, statistics show a significant "talent bias" towards kids who were born in January. Conversely, those born in the last months of the year tend to have all kinds of issues - they are more prone to social challenges, struggle in sports and are over-represented among those who get diagnosed with ADHD.

The sign of either a winner or a loser, but rarely something in between.

This is called the Relative Age Effect (RAE), also known as birthdate effect. Because schoolkids are grouped according to their birth year, those who have been born early in the year have a significant edge in both their mental and physical development compared to those born in the last months. And so, among other kids in their class they stand out as faster, stronger and more mature than their classmates, while in reality they are simply older. School is a competitive environment, but the competition isn't fair.


While trained (and competent) teachers are aware of RAE and should take it into account in their work, it definitely won't make their jobs any easier. Anyone who's ever tried their hand at teaching (as I have) knows how hard it is to keep the lessons flowing, all while trying to remain unbiased. When it's a wildly heterogeneous group in terms of learning ability, this becomes an impossible task. Kids are also quick to notice if some of their classmates require the teacher's help more than others, which spells trouble.


Different kinds of methods (such as moving the cut-off dates for semesters) have been tried, but problems still persist. It's a complicated issue to tackle (age difference is also just one factor, as children differ in all kinds of ways), but one that I personally feel demands more attention. Should we have our kids tested for their abilities, perhaps with their birth date taken into account as a factor, and form them into groups according to some system of this kind? With our modern tools for data analysis, this doesn't seem far fetched. Or would it just create another way to put labels on our children?


Let me know what you think in the comments.

Comments

  1. Sorry, this is a bit long. I just remembered the school system from the Netherlands when I was an exchange student there. They make the students take a nation wide test at around age 12-13 and according to the results they divide the students into three categories: vmbo (4y), havo (5y) and vwo (6y). Students from vmbo can go to a vocational school, from havo (and also after graduating from both vmbo and the vocational school) to a university of applied sciences and from vwo to a university.

    I used to think this was harsh and puts a lot of pressure on young students but maybe it's good in some ways.. After doing a bit of research I also found that you can move up a level after graduating from your current one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. vmbo, havo and vwo are levels for the middle school in a way and they prepare the students in different ways according to where they "are headed" if that makes sense

      Delete
    2. Japanese schools use a similar system, where each year students are ranked on how good their grades are on a level between 1-5, 5 being the lowest and 1 being the highest.

      Delete
  2. That's really interesting, I've never thought about that. It kinda sucks that just based on your birth month you might have a disadvantage against other students. Although I guess kids born in December could always redo kindergarten and start school one year later.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Parents can apply to have their kids start school later, but it's not very common I think.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rememberment, Chapter XXI: 1986

Rememberment, Chapter XX: Christmas Quarrels